(Pronunciation abbreviated in sentence)
石原慎太郎は保守界隈にとって、文字通り太陽であった。が、2002年から勃興し始めたネット保守にとって、石原は太陽ではあったものの、それは夕刻の太陽であった。つまり旬の人ではなかった。石原の死後、90年代以降の日本の右傾化や、特にゼロ年代から顕著となるネット空間における右傾化に対して、石原が一定程度の影響を与えたかのように言う向きもあるが、私からしたら全くピント外れである。
Ishihara is not the one who affected the conservative area of the early 90s to the early 90s.If you say that, it is overwhelmingly Yoshinori Kobayashi and the "Making Society", and the most popular and starter of hawks at this time was Nishimura, the former Democratic Party (later Democratic, Restoration, etc.), not Ishihara.It was Shingo.
Nevertheless, for old conservatives, Ishihara is "Society to support Totsuka Yacht School".
(Note * The meeting to support the Totsuka Yacht School is Totsuka in the 1982-83 "criminal case" in the 1982-83 incident where four trainees and others died due to a kind of Spartizu education by the founder Hiroshi Totsuka.Since it was impeached from, maintenance celebrities mainly made to support Totsuka et al.)
In many cases, it is a minor case in terms of mixture, and online maintenance after the zero is a perfect single spear from the zero ages, and Totsuka.Not only the yacht school, but also the history of the Liberal Democratic Party struggle in the LDP (Kakuei), which began before and after Ishihara participated, was generally concerned or ignorant.
石原自体がネットでのツール、とりわけSNSや動画チャンネルを使った発信を、直接個人としては原則行わなかったこともあり、石原はネットが主力となったゼロ年代以降の保守界隈では「点景」にすぎなかった。石原という夕刻の太陽が、ネット保守と完全に接触して、「午前5時の太陽」になったのは、石原都政の後半にあたる2012年4月、石原自身が尖閣諸島の地権者から東京都として同島の地所を買い取る構想をぶち上げた時である。石原は購入に際して基金を立ち上げ、全国から浄財を募った。これがネット上で大拡散され、同基金には約14億円以上のカネが集まった。この時になってようやく、ネット保守と石原は接続したのである。
If you think about it now, it's not clear what to contribute when Tokyo buys the Senkaku Islands.Expectations for the construction of a certain set of embodations, a kind of heliport, and a certain settlement facility have expanded, but the Democratic government at that time was wary of Ishihara's movement and negotiated with the Senkaku District ahead of Ishihara.Was a sales contract and nationalized the island (nationalization of the Senkaku Islands).It is ironic that this rapid movement has become a close -to -eye starting point for the conflict over the Senkaku in the middle of the day, which leads to the present.As a result, Ishihara intended a clear accumulation of effective control over the Senkaku, as a result of Ishihara's planning, which was now the opposite.
Ishihara's political belief as a hawks in the population (Hitoguchi) is undoubtedly a book with Sony's Akio Morita, "NO" (Kobunsha, 1989).Some people say the million hits of this book like the so -called "Japanese amazing book" in the future, but that is also out of focus.
"Japan, which can be said to be", is almost a new book size, which is slightly larger than the paperback book, and the number of text pages is only 160 pages, so you can read it in about 20 minutes.As already mentioned, when Ishihara became governor of Tokyo in 1999, Ishihara was the sun in the evening in the conservative area, and even in the 21st century, Ishihara used the Internet as an individual."Japan, which can be called" NO ", is not bible in the conservative area.
"Japan, which can be called" NO ", is a book with a new right -wing character if it is a book with a new right -wing character if it is compliant with the reminiscellum in the conservative area, as it should be strongly called NO for the United States as the letter.It is done.The new right wing is the flow of the "anti -American anti -so -Soviet", which has been rising since the 1970s, as an anti -war, which has continued "pro -American anti -soa (anti -communion)", no matter what the post -war maintenance is.The belonging and currently inherit this genealogy are organizations such as "Ichizukai" and "Unified Front Reference Army".
確かに文中、石原はアメリカ白人の根底にある、ある種の黄禍論的人種差別をひきあいにだし、またアメリカによる原爆投下にもその蔑視が底流にあるためだと吠える。しかし実際にこの本を読んでみると、石原が怒りをあらわにしているのはアメリカではなく、経済力・技術力があるのにアメリカに対してNOと言わない日本の「堕落」した外交官や政治家でに対してである。より正確にこの本を表せば、『「NO」と言える日本』ではなく『「NO」と”言えない”日本』とつけた方がしっくりくるように思う。
In "Japan, which can be called" NO ", the Japanese economy has reached its peak, and at the same time, Japan's national power (then GNP) approaches about 60 % of the United States, the global economy has swept the world economy, and the golden age has reached 1989.It was published in the year.At the beginning of this book, no matter how much of the United States Seo compete, Japan holds semiconductor technology, which is the basis of its military power, so Japan has the consequences of the US -Soviet Cold War in the real world.Starts with the introduction.
Indeed, Japan's semiconductor technology at that time was objectively the best in the world.Not only semiconductors, but also Japanese products around the world, including daily necessities for automobiles and appliances.In the United States, Japanese cars were beaten, Toshiba's video deck was destroyed by hammer, and Japanese -US trade friction became remarkable, and American intellectuals were seriously talking about the "Japanese threats."
Ishihara criticizes Nakasone (Yasuhiro) in "Japan, which can be said to be".Ishihara followed by Nakasone in response to the fact that the next support fighter (FSX) plan, which was raised by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, was actually frozen and compromised under the pressure of the United States.The posture,
"I can't regret failure that doesn't say" no "while having a card that can be said to be" no "" (I can't regret it, P.125)
と酷評する。要するに日本はアメリカに伍する経済力と、ソ連をはるかに凌駕する技術を持っているのだから、独自の外交方針で以て、自主防衛を貫徹せよ―。それが今の日本にできるはずなのに、中曽根がそれをしないで「ロン=ヤス」等と言っているのは児戯に等しいと喝破したのである。石原の憤怒は、アメリカではなく「実力があるのに何もしない」日本に向けられていた。『「NO」と言える日本』は、手垢のついた日本スゴイ本でも、「反米本」でもない。明らかに日本の堕落・無能を憂いた本である。
In the latter half of the "NO", the United States has been replaced by Reagan to the same Republican Bush (father).From the date of publication, the election of Bush (Father) (US presidential election in 1988 ... Bush (Father) won the Democratic Party's candidate M. Dukakis), but with Morita.The dialogue ends here.
In the 1980s, the United States was overwhelmingly crushed in Japan in the manufacturing industry, so he broke into a new way of IT and finance through Bush (father) and Bill Clinton, and later.The so -called "GAFA" was born and swept the world.Japan did not forget the successful experience of the 1980s after the collapse of the bubble, neglected to shift the industrial structure and improve productivity, and could not do self -reform since the Japan Azz number one era.At the beginning of "Japan, which can be called" NO ", Ishihara Ishihara cut off the fire, and Morita agreed, and the readers may know that it is now inevitable to see the Japanese semiconductor technology.。
”技術立国”日本は、『「NO」と言える日本』の時代、半導体シェアで世界の50%近くを占めていたが、その後、韓国・台湾・中国等に猛追され、現在ではその比率は10%に満たない。石原が「(日本は国力・技術力があるのだから)アメリカにNOと言わないのは至極おかしい」と提唱してから、たった20年で日本の現状はこんな風になった。一人あたりGDPで、1990年代中葉に日本はルクセンブルクに比類する大富裕国だったが、現在ではイタリアやスペインと同等に零落している。アジアの中でも、シンガポールや香港に劣後する。
Since the metabolism of industrial conversion is slow, there is a statistics that a prolonged structural recession has occurred and the real wage is less than South Korea.Japan has long lost the incentive of "economic and technology", which is the only one.Under these circumstances, the fact that Ishihara became governor of Tokyo in 1999, and the fact that he was exposed from the conservative area over the Senkaku mentioned above in 2012 over time.Let's tell that Ishihara is the "evening sun".
Ishihara had many gaps throughout the parliament, the Governor of the Tokyo Metropolitan Governor, and thereafter.If Ishihara's "NO" is set as a thesis of his political view, and it resembles the new right wing, the new right wing is in principle to advocate "anti -American anti -sova".There is a strong tendency to explore the Asian community.The right wing before the war, for example, Mitsunoyama, the founder of Genyosha, is the theory that the unity of Asians (Asian state) is absolutely necessary to compete with the Western modern era.It was.Therefore, the current new right wing "Ichizuikai" and "Unified Front Refine Army" are "anti -American anti -joint", but at the same time they are Asianists.He never ridiculed China or South Korea, and oppose discrimination against the same Asian race.
石原はどうか。都知事になった翌年の2000年4月、陸上自衛隊の式典で石原は演説した。その中で、石原は、「三国人、外国人が凶悪な犯罪を繰り返している。大きな震災では騒擾事件すら想定される。警察の力には限りがある。(自衛隊の)みなさんに出動していただいて、災害だけでなく、治安の維持も大きな目的として遂行してほしい」と述べたことが大きく報道された。所謂「三国人発言」である。ここでいう三国人とは主に朝鮮半島出身者(在日コリアンを含む)や韓国人である。彼らが犯罪を率先して行っているというのは、ネット保守が好む陰謀論をそのままトレースしたものだ。断っておくが新右翼は、アジア主義の立場から絶対にこういった用語を使わない。物議かもした石原の「三国人発言」だが、この一件を以ても、石原は新右翼の系統に属させることは難しい。
Ishihara was a great celebrity and writer who had no choice but to be pushed by the Tokyo Governor in 1999.As a result, I rarely performed the "dissemination of the Internet as an individual" that became noticeable from the zero age (probably there was no staff on the Internet, and I did not feel the need to utilize online before that.It was probably).Therefore, it seemed that it was compatible with the net maintenance and the contact was sparse.
Ishihara as a scenery, and Ishihara was the sun as an evening.Of course, as mentioned above, I have been exposed to the Internet maintenance on the Internet maintenance on the Senkaku Islands Fund.However, the cheering was a cheese toast or pizza that was easy to heat and cool because the so -called "conservative speech person" was the 18th, appearing in conservative videos, using SNS, etc.。
In particular, in the 2012 Senkaku Islands Purchase Plan (Fund), online maintenance was exposed to Ishihara, and the exposure to such conservative magazines increased.In particular, Ishihara resigned from the Governor of Tokyo in October 2012, and established the "Sun Party" in the same year.After many twists and turns, such as joining the Restoration, the exposure in Ishihara's conservative area reached its peak when he became the highest advisor to the next generation party (then) in 2014.
もっともそれは個人がコントロールする動画ではなく、保守系雑誌でのインタビューやら、対談という形式で行われたのが概ね基礎である。編集者や出版社が忖度したのか、はたまた読者がそれを求めたのか。それに対し石原も忠実に応えたのかは分からないが、石原は都知事を辞してから、既存の保守界隈や、それに連なるネット保守に対し、まったく「NO」と言うことはなかった。すでに述べたような「三国人発言」を筆頭とするように、石原の中には確固としたアジア主義が存在していなかったためであろう。だから石原は、ゼロ年代を経由して2010年代に繁茂したネット上のヘイトスピーチや、2020年代に入るやそれがますます(巧妙に)熾烈になり、臆面もなく引用する、所謂「保守系言論人」に対し、最後まで「NO」と言うことは無かった。
I don't know what the causal and personal experience of Ishihara had a disdain for Koreans and Koreans and Chinese.But clearly, he did not say "no" in the tide of hate speech, especially in the 21st century, or the tendency of conservative area that has become fierce in the 21st century.
石原より先に天国に行った、保守系論客として批評家の西部邁は、一見すると石原と同じような「反米反ソ(反共)」の新右翼の系統のように見えるが、西部が新右翼の正統派であるからこそ、彼は21世紀の保守界隈の惨状に絶望していた感が濃厚であった。私は西部の晩年、直接彼にお会いしたことがった。西部は「愛国とヘイトが両立している保守界隈」を異常であると喝破し、名前は出さないものの(…実際にはかなり出していたが、ここでは詳述しない)、数々の保守団体を「単なる馬鹿だ」と言ってのけた。
西部は、時としてヘイトスピーチに汚染されがちな保守界隈に対し、とりわけ東日本大震災以降「NO」を顕著に言い続けた。最期まで、ネット界隈で人気の「保守系言論人」を、その教養水準からして哀れみ、彼らの「ファン」も心底軽蔑していた。しかし石原は、私の記憶するところでは、西部が「NO」と言った保守界隈にも、ネット空間にも、ついに「NO」を言うことなく逝った。既存の保守界隈にも、ネットに対しても、「NO」と言えなかった石原慎太郎の実像は、客観的に事実である。石原の評価は、後世の歴史家に委ねられるだろう。(了)